Context loss
every new chat starts from zero, so people re-paste the same background and re-upload the same files before they get a useful answer.
Projects is a persistent workspace for one ongoing effort, so context, knowledge and teams stay together.
Projects is a persistent workspace for one ongoing effort, built into an AI for work platform that brings together agents, workflows, search, memory and knowledge. It keeps chats, files, instructions, memory and agents in one place, so context carries over from chat to chat and teams can share it.
One-line summary Chat is great for single questions but breaks down for ongoing work. I designed Projects so people can keep context, knowledge and AI behavior together instead of re-explaining everything in every new chat.
In a plain chat product every chat starts from zero, so people doing ongoing work repeat themselves, lose track of earlier work and stop trusting what the AI knows.
| Pain point | What users say | Impact | How Projects solves it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeating context | I paste the same background into every chat. | Wasted time, inconsistent answers | Project knowledge and instructions apply to every chat |
| Scattered work | I can’t find the chat where we worked this out. | Hard to find and resume work | Chats grouped in one project, with an overview to resume from |
| Inconsistent output | I have to tell it the tone and format every time. | Rework and heavy editing | Project instructions with starter templates |
| Working alone | My team can’t use the same context I set up. | Duplicate effort across the team | Shared projects with roles and shared knowledge |
Projects let people keep working on the same thing, so they stay longer, bring in teammates and become worth paying for.
Help the business in four ways:
People at work have ongoing efforts, not one-off questions, and plain chat makes them start over each time
every new chat starts from zero, so people re-paste the same background and re-upload the same files before they get a useful answer.
tone, format and rules have to be re-stated each time, so the same task gives different results from one chat to the next.
team mates cannot work from the same knowledge and instructions, so each person builds a private version that drifts from the rest.
How might we let people organize AI work around ongoing efforts, so context persists, knowledge is reusable and output stays consistent, without adding setup effort that feels like admin?
I studied how ChatGPT Projects and Claude Projects frame the same idea, then compared them to my product’s needs.
Projects serve three primary personas and one secondary persona. I ranked them by how often they use projects and how much they influence adoption.
Produces the same weekly outputs from the same documents and format.
get the same format, tone and structure every week without rewriting prompts. Have her rules for sources, wording and checks apply automatically in every chat. Start a task in seconds, with background and files already in place, and spend her time reviewing output instead of rebuilding context.
Leads a team where new people join and others step away mid-effort.
have everyone on the team work from the same instructions and knowledge. Onboard a new member in minutes, with the full context already there, and keep output consistent in tone and format across the team. Hand over work without losing context when someone steps away.
Responsible for what is shared, with whom, and outside the workspace.
set safe sharing defaults so teams can start without waiting for approval. Limit sharing outside the workspace and restrict public links, and see who has access to each project and what changed through an audit log. Avoid orphaned projects by transferring ownership when an owner leaves.
This use case shows the full path from creating a project to a team using it, and ties together the personas, flows and sharing rules in this case study.
Primary actor → Team Lead
Goal → Give the team one place where the weekly report is produced from the same sources, rules and format every time
Trigger → The team keeps re-pasting the same background and producing reports in different formats
Preconditions → Priya has a workspace account and can create projects; sharing is enabled by the admin; the report's source files or connected sources exist
Postconditions → A shared project exists with instructions, knowledge and members; Maya can produce the report in minutes and every chat follows the same rules
They kept the design focused on what people need from ongoing AI work, and I used them as a test whenever I compared options.
Let users create a project with just a name, then add context and structure as their needs evolve.
Clearly show what information the AI uses, where it comes from, and how it shapes responses.
Isolate context by project and give users clear control to view, edit, and manage what the AI remembers.
Turn project content into actionable insights, relevant recommendations, and clear next steps not just a collection of files.
Build sharing, permissions, and role-based access into the experience from the start.
I studied how ChatGPT Projects and Claude Projects frame the same idea, then compared them to my product's needs.
Decision an overview with recent chats, key knowledge, and suggested next actions.
Why returning to ongoing work should feel like resuming, not starting over.
Three roles keep the model easy to explain. Each role has a one-line description in the share dialog, so people do not need to guess.
| Capability | Viewer | Editor | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| See instructions, knowledge and activity | |||
| Chat inside the project | |||
| Add files and connect knowledge sources | |||
| Edit instructions | |||
| Attach or edit agents and workflows | |||
| Invite or remove members | |||
| Change visibility and link settings | |||
| Archive, delete or transfer ownership |
They kept the design focused on what people need from ongoing AI work, and I used them as a test whenever I compared options.
Clear roles, visible context and honest memory rules drove adoption.
Starting private and sharing on purpose prevented accidental exposure.
A summary line in the share dialog prevented most permission mistakes in testing.
Projects turn one-off AI chats into a workspace where context, knowledge and teams persist. Each problem was framed as a How Might We question and answered with a design decision.
An overview of key interactions across projects, conversations, knowledge, and collaboration.
They kept the design focused on what people need from ongoing AI work, and I used them as a test whenever I compared options.
Good AI respects people’s time and shows its work. Projects remember what matters, show what the AI is using and let teams work together.
What this project taught me about UX
The biggest gain comes from never making people say the same thing twice.
When the AI shows what it knows and uses, people trust it.
Empty, error and no-access states are where trust is won or lost.
Thank you for reading. I love turning complex AI into simple, trustworthy products, and I’d be glad to talk about how I can help your team.